A. Ludlow Kramer
Secretary of State, 1965-1974
Prince v. Kramer
George Prince was a Mercer Island attorney who filed suit against the state of
Washington after the Legislature failed to redistrict during the 1971 session. In this case,
Prince specifically requested that the court exercise jurisdiction over redistricting, thus
providing a remedy when the Legislature did not fulfill its duties. The three-judge panel
(which included District Court Judge William Beeks, who had written the majority
opinion in Thigpen v. Meyers (1964)) was reluctant to take such a step. They gave the
Legislature one more chance, ordering members to complete a redistricting measure by
February 1972. The justices warned that they would redistrict themselves if the
Legislature failed to meet this last deadline. Despite the court's order, the legislators
could not agree on any proposals, and the session ended with no acceptable redistricting
plan. Thus, in their April 1972 ruling on Prince v. Kramer, the justices took over the
redistricting effort and chose a special master to draw new legislative and congressional
boundaries for the state.
|
|