Redistricting Home
Introduction Pre-1950 The 1950s The 1960s The 1970s The 1980s The 1990s 2000 and Beyond
The 1960s: 1963

Appeal to the Supreme Court

Pressure was on the Washington Legislature to come up with a redistricting solution during the 1963 session, but a coalition in the House of Representatives complicated these efforts. The House was fractured when six dissident Democrats joined forces with Republican leadership to oust Democratic powerhouse John L. O'Brien from his position as Speaker of the House. The feud was ignited, in part, by O'Brien's refusal to address the issue of redistricting in a manner that the dissidents considered acceptable. The new coalition then went on to play a pivotal role in future redistricting proposals.

Victor A. Meyers photo Victor A. Meyers
Secretary of State, 1957-1965

It was unlikely in such a contentious political climate that legislators could come to a decision on a partisan issue like redistricting, and indeed, the regular session closed without any agreement. Governor Albert Rosellini immediately called a special session, but after 23 days, it, too, ended with no redistricting plan. The courts then stepped in and in May of 1963 the District Court judges who ruled on Thigpen v. Meyers found Washington's legislative districts null and void. The Secretary of State was prohibited from conducting elections in the existing districts.

In July, the Secretary of State appealed Thigpen v. Meyers to the United States Supreme Court, and asked the Justices to stay the District Court's ruling until a decision could be made on the appeal. A stay would reinstate Washington's legislative districts, but without it, the legislators were faced with holding a special session to establish new districts or possibly to force all candidates to run at-large. The Supreme Court's answer did not come until the following year, so 1963 closed without legal legislative districts and without a new redistricting plan.


Oral History
McCurdy Manuscript
Court Cases
1962 1964