WSR 17-23-045 EXPEDITED RULES DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE [Filed November 8, 2017, 1:34 p.m.] Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information: WAC 458-14-005 Definitions, 458-14-046 Regularly convened session—Board duties—Presumption—Equalization to revaluation year, 458-14-116 Orders of the board—Notice of value adjustment—Effective date, 458-16-165 Conditions under which nonprofit organizations, associations, or corporations may obtain a property tax exemption, 458-19-070 Five dollars and ninety cents statutory aggregate limit calculation, and 458-19-075 Constitutional one percent limit calculation. Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects, Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: WAC 458-14-005, 458-14-046, and 458-14-116 are being amended to incorporate language from:
WAC 458-16-165 is being amended to incorporate language from:
WAC 458-19-070 and 458-19-075 are being amended to incorporate language from:
All rules listed above also include general editing and formatting updates.
Copies of draft rules are available for viewing and printing on our web site at dor.wa.gov. Reasons Supporting Proposal: WAC 458-14-005, 458-14-046, and 458-14-116 are being updated so boards of equalization understand when it must meet for its regularly convened session, when to send notice to appellants when a value adjustment is made, and to remove outdated language regarding county revaluation cycles.
WAC 458-16-165 is being updated so county assessor staff and applicants understand the applicable requirements for two new property tax exemptions.
WAC 458-19-070 and 458-19-075 are being updated so county assessor staff have guidelines for prorating different types of levies if the levies for that year exceed either the $5.90 statutory aggregate limit or the constitutional one percent rate. Statute Being Implemented: RCW 84.36.049, 84.36.670, 84.41.030, 84.41.041, 84.48.010, 84.48.034, 84.52.010, 84.52.043, 84.52.065, 84.52.120, 84.52.125, 84.52.816, 84.55.092. Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state court decision. Name of Proponent: Department of revenue, governmental. Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting: Leslie Mullin, 6400 Linderson Way S.W., Tumwater, WA, 360-534-1589; Implementation and Enforcement: Randy Simmons, 6400 Linderson Way S.W., Tumwater, WA, 360-534-1605. This notice meets the following criteria to use the expedited adoption process for these rules: Adopts or incorporates by reference without material change federal statutes or regulations, Washington state statutes, rules of other Washington state agencies, shoreline master programs other than those programs governing shorelines of statewide significance, or, as referenced by Washington state law, national consensus codes that generally establish industry standards, if the material adopted or incorporated regulates the same subject matter and conduct as the adopting or incorporating rule. Explanation of the Reason the Agency Believes the Expedited Rule-Making Process is Appropriate: The expedited rule-making process is applicable to these rule updates because the department is incorporating changes resulting from 2011, 2015, 2016, and 2017 legislation. NOTICE THIS RULE IS BEING PROPOSED UNDER AN EXPEDITED RULE-MAKING PROCESS THAT WILL ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR THE AGENCY TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS, PREPARE A SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT, OR PROVIDE RESPONSES TO THE CRITERIA FOR A SIGNIFICANT LEGISLATIVE RULE. IF YOU OBJECT TO THIS USE OF THE EXPEDITED RULE-MAKING PROCESS, YOU MUST EXPRESS YOUR OBJECTIONS IN WRITING AND THEY MUST BE SENT TO Leslie Mullin, Department of Revenue, P.O. Box 47453, Olympia, WA 98504-7453, phone 360-534-1589, fax 360-534-1606, email LeslieMu@dor.wa.gov, AND RECEIVED BY January 22, 2018. November 8, 2017 Erin T. Lopez Rules Coordinator
AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending WSR 06-13-034, filed 6/14/06, effective 7/15/06)
WAC 458-14-005 Definitions.
This rule includes the definitions of terms used throughout chapter 458-14 WAC regarding county boards of equalization. For the purposes of chapter 458-14 WAC, the following definitions apply ((to chapter 458-14 WAC)) unless the context requires otherwise:
(1) "Alternate member" means a board member appointed by the county legislative authority to serve in the temporary absence of a regular board member.
(2) "Arm's length transaction" means a transaction between parties under no duress, not motivated by special purposes, and unaffected by personal or economic relationships between themselves, both seeking to maximize their positions from the transaction.
(3) "Assessed value" means the value of real or personal property determined by an assessor.
(4) "Assessment roll" means the record which contains the assessed values of real and personal property in the county.
(5) "Assessment year" means the calendar year when ((the)) real and personal property is listed and valued by the assessor and precedes the calendar year when the tax is due and payable.
(6) "Assessor" means a county assessor or any person authorized to act on behalf of the assessor.
(7) "Board" means a county board of equalization.
(8) "County financial authority" means the county treasurer or any other person in a county responsible for billing and collecting property taxes.
(9) "County legislative authority" means the board of county commissioners or the county legislative body as established under a home rule charter.
(10) "Department" means the department of revenue.
(11) "Documentary evidence" means comparable sales data, cost data, income data, or any other item of evidence, including maps or photographs, which makes the existence of relevant facts more or less probable.
(12) "Equalize" means ensuring that comparable properties are comparably valued and refers to the process by which the county board of equalization reviews the valuation of real and personal property on the assessment roll as ((returned)) certified by the assessor, so that each tract or lot of real property and each article or class of personal property is entered on the assessment roll at one hundred percent of its true and fair value.
(13) "Interim member" means a board member appointed by the county legislative authority to fill a vacancy ((caused by the resignation or permanent incapacity)) of a regular board member. The interim member ((shall)) serves for the balance of the regular board member's term.
(14) "Manifest error" means an error in listing or assessment, which does not involve a revaluation of property, including the following:
(a) An error in the legal description;
(b) A clerical or posting error;
(c) Double assessments;
(d) Misapplication of statistical data;
(e) Incorrect characteristic data;
(f) Incorrect placement of improvements;
(g) Erroneous measurements;
(h) The assessment of property exempted by law from taxation;
(i) The failure to deduct the exemption allowed by law to the head of a family; or
(j) Any other error which can be corrected by reference to the records and valuation methods applied to similarly situated properties, without exercising appraisal judgment.
(15) "Market value" means the amount of money a buyer of property willing but not obligated to buy would pay a seller of property willing but not obligated to sell, taking into consideration all uses to which the property is adapted and might in reason be applied. True and fair value is the same as market value or fair market value.
(16) (("May" as used in this chapter is expressly intended to be permissive.
(17))) "Member" means a regular member of a board.
(((18))) (17) "Reconvene" refers to the board's limited power to meet to equalize assessments in the current assessment year after the board's regularly convened session is adjourned, or to meet to hear matters concerning prior years.
(((19))) (18) "Regularly convened session" means the statutorily mandated session of three to twenty-eight days ((period)) commencing annually on the later of:
(a) July 15th((, or));
(b) The first business day following July 15th ((if it should fall)) when it occurs on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday; or
(c) Within fourteen days of the assessor certifying the county assessment roll to the board.
(((20))) (19) "Revaluation" means a change in value of property based upon an exercise of appraisal judgment.
(((21))) (20) "Shall" as used in this chapter, unless the context indicates otherwise, is expressly intended to be mandatory.
(((22))) (21) "Taxpayer" means the person or entity whose name and address ((appears)) is listed on the assessment rolls, or their duly authorized agent, personal representative, or guardian. "Taxpayer" also includes the person or entity whose name and address should ((appear)) be listed on the assessment rolls as the owner of the property, but because of a mistake((,)) or delay,((or inadvertence does not so appear;)) is not listed. For example, ((in an instance)) when the assessment rolls have not yet been updated after a transfer of property.
A lessee may also be considered a "taxpayer" solely for pursuing a property tax appeal if the property owner ((may contract)) contracted with ((a)) the lessee for the purpose of making the lessee responsible for the payment of the property tax ((and the lessee may be deemed to be a taxpayer solely for the purpose of pursuing property tax appeals in his or her own name)). If the contract is made, the lessee ((shall be)) is responsible for providing the county assessor with a proper and current mailing address.
(((23))) (22) "Tax year" means the calendar year when property taxes are due and payable.
AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending WSR 06-13-034, filed 6/14/06, effective 7/15/06)
WAC 458-14-046 Regularly convened session—Board duties—Presumption((—Equalization to revaluation year)).
(1) Introduction. This rule explains the process described in RCW 84.48.010 ((requires)), requiring the boards of equalization (board) to meet annually ((beginning July 15th)) for its regularly convened session.
(2) Other rules to reference. Readers may want to refer to other rules for additional information, including:
(a) WAC 458-14-015 Jurisdiction of county boards of equalization.
(b) WAC 458-14-025 Assessment roll adjustments not requiring board action.
(c) WAC 458-14-026 Assessment roll corrections agreed to by taxpayer.
(d) WAC 458-14-076 Hearings on petitions—Withdrawal.
(3) Definitions. The definitions found in WAC 458-14-005 apply to this rule.
(4) Examples. This rule includes examples that identify a set of facts and then state a conclusion. These examples should only be used as a general guide. The department will evaluate each case on its particular facts and circumstances.
(5) Regularly convened session.
(a) The board must meet in open session for the purpose of equalizing property values in the county and to hear taxpayer appeals. The board must ((remain in session not less than three days, nor more than twenty-eight days, provided that the board,)) meet annually, on the later of:
(i) July 15th;
(ii) The first business day following July 15th when it occurs on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday; or
(iii) Within fourteen days of the assessor certifying the county assessment roll to the board.
(b) The board must meet for a minimum of three days during their regular convened session, which can last up to twenty-eight days.
(c) With the approval of the county legislative authority, the board may ((convene)) reconvene at any time ((when)) if the number of taxpayer petitions filed exceeds twenty-five, or ten percent of the number of petitions filed in the preceding year, whichever is greater((. It is only during this twenty-eight day session that the board has the authority to equalize property values on its own initiative)).
(((2))) (d) The board has the authority, on its own initiative, to equalize property values during its regularly convened session.
(e) At its regularly convened session, the board must adjust the current assessment year's value of property, both real and personal, to its true and fair value, but only if the board finds that the assessed value is not correct based upon:
(((a))) (i) Information available to the board and/or the board's own examination and comparison of the assessment roll; or
(((b))) (ii) A request by the assessor, together with necessary valuation information, for correction of an error which correction requires appraisal judgment.
(((3))) (f) The board must ((also)) hold hearings ((in accordance with WAC 458-14-076)) on properly and timely filed taxpayer petitions.
(((4))) (g) The board must consider any taxpayer appeals from an assessor's decision with respect to a tax exemption of real or personal property, and determine:
(i) If the taxpayer is entitled to the tax exemption; and
(ii) If so, the amount of the tax exemption.
(h) At the conclusion of a board's regularly convened session, it must provide the department with its adjournment date. The adjournment date assists the department in determining whether a board is eligible to reconvene.
(6) Presumption of correctness. The assessor's valuation as certified to the board of equalization under RCW 84.40.320 is presumed correct, except with respect to subsection (((2)(b))) (5)(e)(ii) of this ((section)) rule. The taxpayer may overcome the presumption of correctness in favor of the assessor's valuation as follows:
(a) If a taxpayer shows by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the assessor's overall approach to valuation, or the assessor's valuation method, is flawed or invalid, then the presumption of correctness does not apply. For example, the taxpayer may be able to prove that the assessor failed to deduct any amount for depreciation when using the cost approach to value on an existing improvement. In such a case, the taxpayer only needs to prove the correct value of the property by a preponderance of the evidence.
(b) If a taxpayer shows by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that a specific value within an overall assessed value is incorrect, then the standard of proof shifts to a preponderance of the evidence for all contested issues related to that specific value. For example, the overall assessment of complex industrial properties is often made up of particular values for portions of the property being appraised. An assessor's error on one value decision does not necessarily invalidate the entire property's assessment, and the presumption of correctness in favor of the assessor remains with respect to the remainder of the property.
(((5) In counties which are not on an annual revaluation cycle, the board must, in relation to a taxpayer appeal or otherwise, equalize real property values to true and fair value as of January 1 of the year in which the property was last revalued by the county assessor according to an approved revaluation cycle.
(6) The board must also consider any taxpayer appeals from an assessor's decision with respect to tax exemption of real or personal property, and determine:
(a) If the taxpayer is entitled to an exemption; and
(b) If so, the amount thereof.))
AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending WSR 06-13-034, filed 6/14/06, effective 7/15/06)
WAC 458-14-116 Orders of the board—Notice of value adjustment—Effective date.
(1) Introduction. This rule explains orders issued by the county boards of equalization (board).
(2) Other rules to reference. Readers may want to refer to other rules for additional information, including:
(a) WAC 458-14-095 Record of hearings.
(b) WAC 458-14-105 Hearings—Open sessions—Exceptions.
(3) Definitions. The definitions found in WAC 458-14-005 apply to this rule.
(4) Board orders.
(a) All orders issued by a board must be on ((the)) a form provided or approved by the department and must state the facts and evidence upon which the decision is based and the reason(s) for the decision.
(((2))) (b) All orders of the board must be signed by the ((chairman)) chairperson of the board, provided, ((however,)) that the ((chairman)) chairperson may, by written designation, authorize other members or the board clerk to sign orders on behalf of the ((chairman)) chairperson.
(c) An order issued by the board only applies to the assessment year that was appealed to the board.
(((3) After a hearing,)) (5) Valuation adjustments. If a board adjusts or sustains the valuation of a parcel of real property or an item of personal property, ((the board)) it must serve or mail notice of the ((decision)) board order to the ((appellant)) taxpayer and the assessor within forty-five days of the hearing.
(a) If the valuation is reduced, the new valuation ((shall)) will take effect immediately, subject to the parties' right to appeal the decision.
(b) If the valuation is increased, the increased valuation ((shall)) will become effective thirty days after the date of service or mailing of the ((notice of the adjustment unless)) order. However, if the taxpayer or assessor files a timely appeal petition to the board of tax appeals ((in accordance with WAC 458-14-170, before the effective date. If such a petition is filed)), the increase does not take effect until the board of tax appeals ((disposes of the matter)) has issued its decision.
(((4))) (c) If the valuation is increased without a petition having been filed, the increased valuation ((shall)) will become effective thirty days after the date of service or mailing of the ((notice of the adjustment)) order to the assessor and the taxpayer unless the assessor or taxpayer files a petition with the board on or before the effective date of the order.
(((5) In counties with a multiyear revaluation cycle, orders issued by the board shall have effect up to the end of the revaluation cycle used by the assessor and approved by the department. The board order may contain a specific statement notifying the parties of this effect. If there has been an intervening change in assessed value of the taxpayer's property between the time the petition was filed and the date the board's order is issued, the board's order shall have effect only up to the effective date of the change in assessed value. The same effect will also apply when a valuation adjustment is ordered upon appeal of a board order.
(6) In counties with a multiyear revaluation cycle, once the board has issued a decision with respect to a taxpayer's real property, and when there has been no intervening change in assessed value, any subsequent appeal to the board:
(a) By the same taxpayer relating to the same property shall be treated as a motion for reconsideration. The board must hold a hearing on the appeal/motion only if the taxpayer can show that there is newly discovered evidence that materially affects the basis for the board's decision and the taxpayer can show that the evidence could not with reasonable diligence have been discovered and produced at the original hearing;
(b) By a taxpayer who acquired the property from the taxpayer to whom the board decision was issued, and for a subsequent assessment year, shall be treated as an original appeal.))
AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending WSR 15-07-021, filed 3/10/15, effective 4/10/15)
WAC 458-16-165 Conditions under which nonprofit organizations, associations, or corporations may obtain a property tax exemption.
(1) Introduction. This rule describes the conditions in RCW 84.36.805 and 84.36.840 that most nonprofit organizations, associations, and corporations must satisfy in order to receive ((the)) a property tax exemption ((authorized in)) under chapter 84.36 RCW((, most nonprofit organizations, associations, and corporations must also satisfy the conditions set forth in RCW 84.36.805 and 84.36.840. This rule describes these conditions)).
(2) Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following definitions apply:
(a) "Department" means the department of revenue.
(b) "Inadvertent use" or "inadvertently used" means the use of the property in a manner inconsistent with the purpose for which the exemption is granted through carelessness, lack of attention, lack of knowledge, mistake, surprise, or neglect.
(c) "Maintenance and operation expenses" means items of expense allowed under generally accepted accounting principles to maintain and operate the loaned or rented portion of the exempt property.
(d) "Revenue" means income received from the loan or rental of exempt property when the income exceeds the amount of maintenance and operation expenses attributable to the portion of the property loaned or rented.
(e) "Personal service contract" means a contract between a nonprofit organization, association, or corporation and an independent contractor under which the independent contractor provides a service on the organization's, association's, or corporation's tax exempt property. (See example contained in subsection (((4))) (5)(c) of this rule.)
(3) Examples. This rule includes examples that identify a set of facts and then state a conclusion. These examples should only be used as a general guide. The department will evaluate each case on its particular facts and circumstances.
(4) Applicability of this rule. This rule does not apply to exemptions granted to:
(a) Public burying grounds or cemeteries under RCW 84.36.020;
(b) Churches, parsonages, convents, and church grounds under RCW 84.36.020;
(c) Administrative offices of nonprofit recognized religious organizations under RCW 84.36.032;
(d) Nonprofit homeownership development entities under RCW 84.36.049;
(e) Water distribution property owned by a nonprofit corporation or cooperative association under RCW 84.36.250; ((or
(g) Multipurpose senior citizen centers under RCW 84.36.670.
(((4))) (5) Exclusive use. Exempt property must be exclusively used for the actual operation of the activity for which the nonprofit organization, association, corporation, hospital established under chapter 36.62 RCW, or public hospital district established under chapter 70.44 RCW, received the property tax exemption unless the authorizing statute states otherwise. The property exempted from taxation must not exceed an area reasonably necessary to facilitate the exempt purpose.
(a) Loan or rental of exempt property. As a general rule, the loan or rental of exempt property does not make it taxable if:
(i) The rents or donations received for the use of the property are reasonable and do not exceed the maintenance and operation expenses attributable to the portion of the property loaned or rented; and
(ii) Except for the exemptions under RCW 84.36.030(4), 84.36.037, 84.36.050, and 84.36.060 (1)(a) and (b), the property would be exempt from tax if owned by the organization to which it is loaned or rented.
(b) Fund-raising events. The use of exempt property for fund-raising events conducted by an exempt organization, association, corporation, hospital established under chapter 36.62 RCW, or public hospital district established under chapter 70.44 RCW, does not jeopardize the exemption if the fund-raising events are consistent with the purposes for which the exemption was granted. The term "fund-raising" means any revenue-raising event limited to less than five days in length that disburses fifty-one percent or more of the profits realized from the event to the exempt nonprofit entity conducting the fund-raising event.
(i) Example 1. A nonprofit social service agency holds an art auction in the auditorium of its tax exempt facility to raise funds. The event must be less than five days in length and fifty-one percent of the profits must be disbursed to the social service agency because the fund-raising event is being held on exempt property.
(ii) Example 2. A nonprofit school has a magazine subscription drive to raise funds and the subscriptions are being sold door-to-door by students. There are no limitations on this fund-raising event because the subscription drive is not being held on exempt property.
(c) Personal service contract - Exempt programs. Programs provided under a personal service contract will not jeopardize the exemption if the following conditions are met:
(i) The program is compatible and consistent with the purposes of the exempt organization, association, or corporation;
(ii) The exempt organization, association, or corporation maintains separate financial records as to all receipts and expenses related to the program; and
(iii) A summary of all receipts and expenses of the program are provided to the department upon request.
(iv) Example 3. A nonprofit school may decide to contract with a provider to offer aerobic classes to promote general health and fitness. All brochures and bulletins advertising these classes must show that the school is sponsoring the classes. Under the terms of the contract between the nonprofit school and the aerobics instructor, an independent contractor, the instructor must provide the classes for a predetermined fee. All fees collected from the participants of the classes must be received by the school; the school, in turn, will absorb all costs related to the classes.
(d) Personal service contract - Nonexempt programs. Programs provided under a personal service contract (i) that require the contractor to reimburse the nonprofit organization for program expenses or (ii) in which the instructor is paid a fee based on the number of people who attend the program will be viewed as a rental agreement and will subject the property to property tax.
(e) Inadvertent use. An inadvertent use of the property in a manner inconsistent with the purpose for which the exemption was granted does not subject the property to tax if the inadvertent use is not part of a pattern of use. A "pattern of use" is presumed when an inadvertent use is repeated in the same assessment year or in two or more successive assessment years.
(((5))) (6) No discrimination allowed. The exempt property and the services offered must be available to all persons regardless of race, color, national origin, or ancestry.
(((6))) (7) Compliance with licensing or certification requirements. A nonprofit entity, hospital established under chapter 36.62 RCW, or public hospital district established under chapter 70.44 RCW seeking or receiving a property tax exemption must comply with all applicable licensing and certification requirements imposed by law or regulation.
(((7))) (8) Property sold subject to an option to repurchase. Property sold to a nonprofit entity, hospital established under chapter 36.62 RCW, or public hospital district established under chapter 70.44 RCW with an option to be repurchased by the seller cannot qualify for an exemption. This prohibition does not apply to property sold to a nonprofit entity, as defined in RCW 84.36.560(7), by:
(a) A nonprofit as defined in RCW 84.36.800 that is exempt from income tax under section 501(c) of the federal Internal Revenue Code;
(c) A housing authority created under RCW 35.82.030;
(d) A housing authority meeting the definition of RCW 35.82.210 (2)(a); or
(e) A housing authority established under RCW 35.82.300.
(((8))) (9) Duty to produce financial records. In order to determine whether a nonprofit entity is entitled to receive a property tax exemption under the provisions of chapter 84.36 RCW and before the exemption is renewed each year, the entity claiming exemption must submit a signed statement made under oath, with the department. This sworn statement must include a declaration that the income, receipts, and donations of the entity seeking the exemption have been used to pay the actual expenses incurred to maintain and operate the exempt facility or for its capital expenditures and to no other purpose. It must also include a statement listing the receipts and disbursements of the organization, association, or corporation. This statement must be made on a form prescribed and furnished by the department.
(a) The provisions of this subsection do not apply to an entity either applying for or receiving an exemption under RCW 84.36.020 or 84.36.030.
(b) This signed statement must be submitted on or before March 31st each year by any entity currently receiving a tax exemption. If this statement is not received on or before March 31st, the department will remove the tax exemption from the property. However, the department will allow a reasonable extension of time for filing if the exempt entity has submitted a written request for an extension on or before the required filing date and for good cause.
(((9))) (10) Caretaker's residence. If a nonprofit entity, hospital established under chapter 36.62 RCW, or public hospital district established under chapter 70.44 RCW exempt from property tax under chapter 84.36 RCW employs a caretaker to provide either security or maintenance services and the caretaker's residence is located on exempt property, the residence may qualify for exemption if the following conditions are met:
(a) The caretaker's duties include regular surveillance, patrolling the exempt property, and routine maintenance services;
(b) The nonprofit entity, hospital established under chapter 36.62 RCW, or the public hospital district established under chapter 70.44 RCW demonstrates the need for a caretaker at the facility;
(c) The size of the residence is reasonable and appropriate in light of the caretaker's duties and the size of the exempt property; and
(d) The caretaker receives the use of the residence as part of his or her compensation and does not pay rent. Reimbursement of utility expenses created by the caretaker's presence is not considered rent.
(((10))) (11) Nonexempt uses of property. The use of property exempt under this chapter, other than as specifically authorized by this chapter, nullifies the exemption otherwise available for the property for the assessment year. However, the exemption is not nullified by the use of the property by any individual, group, or entity, where such use is not otherwise authorized by this chapter, for not more than fifty days in each calendar year, and the property is not used for pecuniary gain or to promote business activities for more than fifteen of the fifty days in each calendar year. The fifty and fifteen-day limitations do not include days for setup and takedown activities that take place immediately preceding or following a meeting or other event. If these requirements are not met, the exemption is removed for the affected portion of the property for that assessment year.
(((11))) (12) Segregation of nonqualifying property. Any portion of exempt property not meeting the qualifications of this rule will lose its exempt status. Nonqualifying property must be segregated from property used for exempt purposes. For example, if a portion of a building owned by a nonprofit hospital is rented to a sandwich shop, this portion of the hospital must be segregated from the remainder of the building that is being used for exempt hospital purposes. The portion of the building rented to the sandwich shop is subject to property tax.
AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending WSR 16-02-126, filed 1/6/16, effective 2/6/16)
WAC 458-19-070 Five dollars and ninety cents statutory aggregate limit calculation.
(1) Introduction. The aggregate of all regular levy rates of junior taxing districts and senior taxing districts, other than the state and other specifically identified districts, cannot exceed five dollars and ninety cents per thousand dollars of assessed value in accordance with RCW 84.52.043. When the county assessor finds that this limit has been exceeded, the assessor recomputes the levy rates and establishes a new consolidated levy rate in the manner set forth in RCW 84.52.010. This ((section)) rule describes the prorationing process used to establish a consolidated levy rate when the assessor finds the statutory aggregate levy rate exceeds five dollars and ninety cents. If prorationing is required, the five dollar and ninety cents limit is reviewed before the constitutional one percent limit.
(2) Levies not subject to statutory aggregate dollar rate limit. The following levies are not subject to the statutory aggregate dollar rate limit of five dollars and ninety cents per thousand dollars of assessed value:
(a) Levies by the state;
(b) Levies by or for port or public utility districts;
(c) Excess property tax levies authorized in Article VII, section 2 of the state Constitution;
(d) Levies by or for county ferry districts under RCW 36.54.130;
(e) Levies for acquiring conservation futures under RCW 84.34.230;
(f) Levies for emergency medical care or emergency medical services under RCW 84.52.069;
(g) Levies for financing affordable housing for very low-income households under RCW 84.52.105;
(h) The portion of metropolitan park district levies protected under RCW 84.52.120;
(i) The portions of levies by fire protection districts ((levies)) and regional fire protection service authorities protected under RCW 84.52.125;
(j) Levies for criminal justice purposes under RCW 84.52.135;
(k) Levies for transit-related purposes by a county under RCW 84.52.140;
(l) The protected portion of the levies imposed under RCW ((86.15.160)) 84.52.816 by flood control zone districts ((in a county with a population of seven hundred seventy-five thousand or more that are coextensive with a county)); and
(m) Levies imposed by a regional transit authority under RCW 81.104.175.
(3) Prorationing under consolidated levy rate limitation. RCW 84.52.010 sets forth the prorationing order in which the regular levies of taxing districts will be reduced or eliminated by the assessor to comply with the statutory aggregate dollar rate limit of five dollars and ninety cents per thousand dollars of assessed value. The order contained in the statute lists which taxing districts are the first to either reduce or eliminate their levy rate. Taxing districts that are at the same level within the prorationing order are grouped together in tiers. Reductions or eliminations in levy rates are made on a pro rata basis within each tier of taxing district levies until the consolidated levy rate no longer exceeds the statutory aggregate dollar rate limit of five dollars and ninety cents.
As opposed to the order contained in RCW 84.52.010, which lists the taxing districts that are the first to have their levy rates reduced or eliminated, this ((section)) rule is written in reverse order; that is, it lists the taxing districts that must be first either fully or partially funded. If the statutory aggregate dollar rate is exceeded, then the levy rates for taxing districts within a particular tier must be reduced or eliminated on a pro rata basis. The proration factor, which is multiplied by each levy rate within the tier, is obtained by dividing the dollar rate remaining available to the taxing districts in that tier as a group by the sum of the levy rates originally certified by or for all of the taxing districts within the tier.
(a) Step one: Total the aggregate levy rates requested by all affected taxing districts in the tax code area. If this total is less than five dollars and ninety cents per thousand dollars of assessed value, no prorationing is necessary. If this total levy rate is more than five dollars and ninety cents, the assessor must proceed through the following steps until the aggregate dollar rate is brought within that limit.
(b) Step two: Subtract from $5.90 the levy rates of the county and the county road district if the tax code area includes an unincorporated portion of the county, or the levy rates of the county and the city or town if the tax code area includes an incorporated area, as applicable.
(c) Step three: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rates, if any, for fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.130, regional fire protection service authorities under RCW 52.26.140 (1)(a), library districts under RCW 27.12.050 and 27.12.150, the first fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value for metropolitan park districts created before January 1, 2002, under RCW 35.61.210, and the first fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value for public hospital districts under RCW 70.44.060(6).
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step four.
(d) Step four: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rates, if any, for fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.140 and 52.16.160, and regional fire protection service authorities under RCW 52.26.140 (1)(b) and (c). However, under RCW 84.52.125, a fire protection district((s)) or regional fire protection service authority may protect up to twenty-five cents per thousand dollars of assessed value of the total levies made under RCW 52.16.140 and 52.16.160, or 52.26.140 (1)(b) and (c) from prorationing.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. It is at this point that the provisions of RCW 84.52.125 come into play; that is, a fire protection district or regional fire protection service authority may protect up to twenty-five cents per thousand dollars of assessed value of the total levies made under RCW 52.16.140 and 52.16.160, or 52.26.140 (1)(b) and (c) from prorationing under RCW 84.52.043(2), if the total levies would otherwise be prorated under RCW 84.52.010 (((2)(e))) (3)(a)(iii) with respect to the five-dollar and ninety cent per thousand dollars of assessed value limit. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step five.
(e) Step five: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rate, if any, for the first fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value of metropolitan park districts created on or after January 1, 2002, under RCW 35.61.210.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step six.
(f) Step six: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the twenty-five cent per thousand dollars of assessed value levy rate for metropolitan park districts if it is not protected under RCW 84.52.120, the twenty-five cent per thousand dollars of assessed value levy rate for public hospital districts under RCW 70.44.060(6), and the levy rates, if any, for cemetery districts under RCW 68.52.310 and all other junior taxing districts if those levies are not listed in steps three through five or seven or eight of this subsection.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step seven.
(g) Step seven: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rate, if any, for flood control zone districts other than the portion of a levy protected under RCW ((84.52.815)) 84.52.816.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step eight.
(h) Step eight: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rates, if any, for city transportation authorities under RCW 35.95A.100, park and recreation service areas under RCW 36.68.525, park and recreation districts under RCW 36.69.145, and cultural arts, stadium, and convention districts under RCW 67.38.130.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step nine.
(i) Step nine: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy imposed, if any, for cultural access programs under RCW 36.160.080 until the remaining levy capacity equals zero.
(4) Example.
((1.)) (a) Beginning with the limit of $5.90, subtract the original certified levy rates for the county and county road taxing districts leaving $1.85 available for the remaining districts.
((2.)) (b) Subtract the total of the levy rates for each district within the next tier: The library's $.50, the fire district's $.50 and the hospital's $.50 = $1.50, which leaves $.35 available for the remaining districts.
((3.)) (c) Subtract the fire district's additional $.20 levy rate, which leaves $.15 available for the remaining districts.
((4.)) (d) The remaining $.15 must be shared by the cemetery and the hospital districts within the next tier of levies. The cemetery district originally sought to levy $.1125 and the hospital district sought to levy $.25. The proration factor is arrived at by dividing the amount available ($.15) by the original levy rates ($.3625) requested within that tier resulting in a proration factor of .4138. ((And)) Finally, the original levy rates in this tier of $.1125 and $.25 for the cemetery and hospital, respectively, are multiplied by the proration factor.
AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending WSR 16-02-126, filed 1/6/16, effective 2/6/16)
WAC 458-19-075 Constitutional one percent limit calculation.
(1) Introduction. The total amount of all regular property tax levies that can be applied against taxable property is limited to one percent of the true and fair value of the property in money. The one percent limit is stated in Article VII, section 2 of the state Constitution and the enabling statute, RCW 84.52.050. The constitutional one percent limit is based upon the amount of taxes actually levied on the true and fair value of the property, not the dollar rate used in computing property taxes. This ((section)) rule explains how to determine if the constitutional one percent limit is being exceeded and the sequence in which levy rates will be reduced or eliminated in accordance with RCW 84.52.010 if the constitutional one percent limit is exceeded. The constitutional one percent calculation is made after the assessor ensures that the $5.90 statutory aggregate dollar rate limit is not exceeded.
(2) Preliminary calculations. After prorationing under RCW 84.52.043 (the five dollar and ninety cent per thousand dollars of assessed value limit) has occurred, make the following calculations to determine if the constitutional one percent limit is being exceeded:
(a) First, add all the regular levy rates, except the rates for port and public utility districts, in the tax code area, to arrive at a combined levy rate for that tax code area. "Regular levy rates" in this context means the levy rates that remain after prorationing under RCW 84.52.043 has occurred. The levy rates for port and public utility districts are not included in this computation because they are not subject to the constitutional one percent limit. The rates for the following regular levies are used to calculate the combined levy rate of any particular tax code area:
(i) The local aggregate rate specified in RCW 84.52.065 for the state levy;
(ii) Levies by or for county ferry districts under RCW 36.54.130;
(iii) Levies for acquiring conservation futures under RCW 84.34.230;
(iv) Levies for emergency medical care or emergency medical services under RCW 84.52.069;
(v) Levies for financing affordable housing for very low-income households under RCW 84.52.105;
(vi) The portion of metropolitan park district levies protected under RCW 84.52.120;
(vii) The portions of levies by fire protection districts ((levies)) and regional fire protection service authorities protected under RCW 84.52.125;
(viii) Levies for criminal justice purposes under RCW 84.52.135;
(ix) Levies for transit-related purposes by a county with a population of one million five hundred thousand or more under RCW 84.52.140;
(x) The protected portion of the levies imposed under RCW ((86.15.160)) 84.52.816 by flood control zone districts ((in a county with a population of seven hundred seventy-five thousand or more that are coextensive with a county)); and
(xi) Levies imposed, if any, by a regional transit authority under RCW 81.104.175.
(b) Second, divide ten dollars by the higher of the real or personal property ratio of the county for the assessment year in which the levy is made to determine the maximum effective levy rate. If the combined levy rate exceeds the maximum effective levy rate, then the individual levy rates must be reduced or eliminated until the combined levy rate is equal to the maximum effective levy rate.
(3) Prorationing - Constitutional one percent limit. RCW 84.52.010 sets forth the prorationing order in which levy rates are to be reduced or eliminated when the constitutional one percent limit is exceeded.
As opposed to the order contained in RCW 84.52.010, which lists the taxing districts that are the first to have their levy rates reduced or eliminated, this ((section)) rule is written in reverse order; that is, it lists the taxing districts that must be first either fully or partially funded. If the constitutional one percent limit is exceeded, then the levy rates for taxing districts within a particular tier must be reduced or eliminated on a pro rata basis.
If the constitutional one percent limit is exceeded after performing the preliminary calculations described in subsection (2) of this ((section)) rule, the following levies must be reduced or eliminated until the combined levy rate no longer exceeds the maximum effective levy rate:
(a) Step one: Subtract the aggregate levy rate calculated for the state for the support of common schools from the effective rate limit;
(b) Step two: Subtract the levy rates for the county, county road district, regional transit authority, and for city or town purposes;
(c) Step three: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rates for fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.130, regional fire protection service authorities under RCW 52.26.140 (1)(a), library districts under RCW 27.12.050 and 27.12.150, the first fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value for metropolitan park districts created before January 1, 2002, under RCW 35.61.210, and the first fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value for public hospital districts under RCW 70.44.060(6).
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step four.
(d) Step four: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rates for fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.140 and 52.16.160, and regional fire protection service authorities under RCW 52.26.140 (1)(b) and (c).
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step five.
(e) Step five: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rate for the first fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value of metropolitan park districts created on or after January 1, 2002, under RCW 35.61.210.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levy is reduced to the remaining balance from step four. There is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step six.
(f) Step six: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rates for all other junior taxing districts if those levies are not listed in steps three through five or steps seven through seventeen of this subsection.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step seven.
(g) Step seven: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rate for flood control zone districts other than the portion of a levy protected under RCW ((84.52.815)) 84.52.816.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levy is reduced to the remaining balance in step six. There is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step eight.
(h) Step eight: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rates for city transportation authorities under RCW 35.95A.100, park and recreation service areas under RCW 36.68.525, park and recreation districts under RCW 36.69.145, and cultural arts, stadium, and convention districts under RCW 67.38.130.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step nine.
(i) Step nine: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy imposed, if any, for cultural access programs under RCW 36.160.080.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity from any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, the levy is reduced to the remaining balance in step eight. There is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed to step ten.
(j) Step ten: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rate for the first thirty cents per thousand dollars for emergency medical care or emergency medical services under RCW 84.52.069.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levy is reduced to the remaining balance in step nine. There is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step eleven.
(k) Step eleven: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rates for levies used for acquiring conservation futures under RCW 84.34.230, financing affordable housing for very low-income households under RCW 84.52.105, and any portion of a levy rate for emergency medical care or emergency medical services under RCW 84.52.069 in excess of thirty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levies within this tier must be reduced on a pro rata basis until the balance is zero. After prorationing, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step twelve.
(l) Step twelve: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district with a population of one hundred fifty thousand or more that is protected under RCW 84.52.120.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the portion of the levy within this tier must be reduced to the remaining balance in step eleven. There is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step thirteen.
(m) Step thirteen: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rates for county ferry districts under RCW 36.54.130.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levy is reduced to the remaining balance in step twelve. There is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step fourteen.
(n) Step fourteen: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rate for criminal justice purposes imposed under RCW 84.52.135.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levy is reduced to the remaining balance in step thirteen. There is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step fifteen.
(o) Step fifteen: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rate for a fire protection district((s)) or regional fire protection service authority protected under RCW 84.52.125.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the portion of the levy within this tier must be reduced to the remaining balance in step fourteen. There is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step sixteen.
(p) Step sixteen: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the levy rate for transit-related purposes by a county under RCW 84.52.140.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the levy is reduced to the remaining balance in step fifteen. There is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step seventeen.
(q) Step seventeen: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the protected portion of the levy imposed under RCW ((86.15.160)) 84.52.816 by a flood control zone district ((in a county with a population of seven hundred seventy-five thousand or more that is coextensive with a county.
(i) If the balance is zero, there is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing districts at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(ii) If the balance is less than zero, then the portion of the levy within this tier must be reduced to the remaining balance in step sixteen. There is no remaining levy capacity for any other junior taxing district at a lower tier and their levies, if any, must be eliminated.
(iii) If the remaining balance is greater than zero, this amount is available to the remaining junior taxing districts at a lower tier and the assessor should proceed on to step eighteen.
(r) Step eighteen: Subtract from the remaining levy capacity the portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district that has a population of less than one hundred fifty thousand and is located in a county with a population of one million five hundred thousand or more that is protected under RCW 84.52.120)) until the remaining levy capacity equals zero.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||