Preproposal statement of inquiry was filed as WSR 12-24-053.
Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information: RCW 28A.710.090 Charter school authorizers -- Approval process (Initiative Measure No. 1240, Section 209).
Hearing Location(s): Brouillet Room, Old Capitol Building, 600 Washington Street S.E., Olympia, WA 98504, on February 26, 2013, at 1:00 p.m.
Date of Intended Adoption: February 26, 2013.
Submit Written Comments to: Jack Archer, State Board of Education (SBE), Old Capitol Building, P.O. Box 47206, Olympia, WA 98504-7206, e-mail email@example.com, fax (360) 586-2357, by February 25, 2013.
Assistance for Persons with Disabilities: Contact Jack Archer by February 25, 2013, TTY (360) 725-6025 or (360) 725-6035.
Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects, Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: The purpose of this proposal is to establish an annual application approval process and timelines for entities seeking to be charter school authorizers, as required by subsection (1) of RCW 28A.710.090. Under RCW 28A.710.080, entities seeking to be charter school authorizers that must be approved by the SBE are school district boards of directors. RCW 28A.710.090(1) stipulates that the initial process and timelines must be established no later than ninety days after the effective date of this section. That requires that the SBE establish the initial process and timelines by March 6, 2013. RCW 28A.710.090(2) specifies a minimum set of information, documentation and statements that each applicant to be an authorizer must submit to the SBE. A second purpose of the proposal is to provide specificity and clarity in the materials that must be submitted to the SBE, and to require, as enabled by this section, the submission of additional materials deemed necessary and appropriate by the SBE in evaluating applications. A third purpose is to establish standards and criteria by which the SBE will, as required by RCW 28A.710.090(3), consider the merits of each application and make its decision whether to approve or disapprove. Last, the proposal will establish requirements for the authorizing contract to be executed pursuant to RCW 28A.710.090(4), with specific reference to the applicant school district's proposal and plan for chartering. Adoption of these rules will provide clarity to school districts on the requirements of the statute and the expectations of the SBE for applications to be charter authorizers, and a clear and accountable basis for decisions by the SBE on the applications.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: RCW 28A.710.090.
Statute Being Implemented: Chapter 28A.710 RCW (Initiative 1240).
Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state court decision.
Name of Proponent: SBE, governmental.
Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting: Jack Archer, Old Capitol Building, 600 Washington Street S.E., Olympia, WA, (360) 725-6035; Implementation and Enforcement: Ben Rarick, Old Capitol Building, 600 Washington Street S.E., Olympia, WA, (360) 725-6025.
A school district fiscal impact statement has been prepared under section 1, chapter 210, Laws of 2012.
|WSR||Title of Rule: I-1240 Section 209 Charter Schools Authorizer Approval Process.||Agency: SDF - School District Fiscal Impact - SPI.|
Estimated Expenditures From:
|ACCOUNT||FY 2012||FY 2013||2011-13||2013-15||2015-17|
If fiscal impact is greater than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete entire fiscal note from Parts I-IV.
Part II: Narrative Explanation:
II. A - Brief Description Of What the Measure Does That Has Fiscal Impact: School districts who seek to become authorizers of charter schools will incur costs to obtain this approval through the application process. These costs were estimated based on projected total hours needed to complete the application process.
II. B - Cash Receipts Impact: None.
II. C - Expenditures: Each school district who seeks to become an authorizer would incur $95,000 of expense in the application process.
Part III: Expenditure Detail:
III. A - Expenditures by Object or Purpose:
|Salaries and Wages||60,123|
|Personal Service Contracts||17,000|
|Goods and Services||2,639|
A copy of the statement may be obtained by contacting Lorrell Noahr, Old Capitol Building, 600 Washington Street S.E., Olympia, WA, phone (360) 725-6019, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
January 22, 2013
(2) "School district" or "district" means a school district board of directors.
(3) "Authorizer" shall have the same meaning as set forth in section 201(3) of the act.
(4) "Board" means the state board of education.
(5) "Authorizer application" or "application" means the form developed by the state board of education that must be completed and timely filed as set forth in these rules with the state board of education by a school district seeking approval to be a charter school authorizer.
(2) A school district seeking approval to be a charter school authorizer must submit an "authorizer application" to the state board of education by June 15th of the year in which the district seeks approval as an authorizer. The district's completed application must be sent via electronic mail to email@example.com with the original hand delivered or mailed to the board at the following address:
Washington State Board of Education
600 Washington St. S.E.
Olympia, WA 98504
The original and electronic version of the application must be received by the board no later than June 15th of the year in which the district submits its application.
(3) A school district must provide sufficient and detailed information regarding all of the following in the authorizer application submitted to the board:
(a) The district's strategic vision for chartering. The district must state the purposes that it expects to fulfill in being an authorizer of charter schools, with specific reference to the statutory purposes set forth in section 101 of the act, as well as any district-specific purposes that are a particular priority for the district; the characteristics of the school or schools it is most interested in authorizing, while maintaining a commitment to considering all charter applicants based on the merits of their proposals and the likelihood of success; how the school or schools it wishes to authorize would differ from the schools the district currently operates with regard to leadership, staffing, schedule, curriculum, community engagement, or other features; the educational goals it wishes to achieve; how it will give priority to serving at-risk students, as defined in section 201 of the act, or students from low-performing schools; and how it will protect the autonomy and promote the accountability of the charter schools it oversees.
(b) A plan to support the vision presented, including explanations and evidence of the applicant's budget and personnel capacity and commitment to execute the responsibilities of quality charter authorizing. "Budget and personnel capacity" means the district's capability of providing sufficient assistance, oversight and monitoring to ensure that the charter schools it authorizes will meet all fiscal, academic and operational requirements under the act and comply with all applicable state and federal laws. A district's evidence of budget and personnel capacity shall consist, at a minimum, of a detailed description of the following:
(i) Staff resources to be devoted to charter authorizing and oversight under the act, in full-time equivalent employees, at a level sufficient to fulfill its authorizing responsibilities in accordance with the "Principles and Standards for Quality Charter Authorizing" developed by the National Association of Charter School Authorizers and the provision of this act;
(ii) Job descriptions and professional qualifications of authorizing personnel, demonstrating the district's access to competent and necessary expertise in all areas essential to charter school oversight including, but not limited to: School leadership; curriculum instruction and assessment; special education, English language learners, and other diverse learning needs; performance management; law, finance and facilities, through staff and any contractual relationships or interagency collaborations; and
(iii) An estimate, supported by verifiable data, of the financial needs of the authorizer and a projection of sufficient financial resources, supported by the authorizer oversight fee under section 211 of this act and any other resources, to carry out its authorizing responsibilities in accordance with National Principles and Standards developed by the National Association of Charter School Authorizers and the provisions of the act.
(c) A draft or preliminary outline of the request for proposal(s) that the district would, if approved as an authorizer, issue to solicit charter school applicants. The draft or preliminary outline of the request for proposal(s) shall meet all of the requirements set forth in section 213 (1)(b), as codified, of the act and demonstrate that the applicant intends to implement a comprehensive application process that follows fair procedures and rigorous criteria, and an evaluation and oversight process based on a performance framework meeting the requirements of this act.
(d) A draft of the performance framework that the district would, if approved as an authorizer, use to guide the establishment of a charter contract and for ongoing oversight and evaluation of charter schools. The draft of the performance framework shall, at a minimum, meet the requirements of section 217(2) of the act including specific descriptions of each indicator, measure and metric enumerated therein; and shall provide that student academic proficiency, student academic growth, achievement gaps in both proficiency and growth, graduation rates, and postsecondary readiness are measured and reported in conformance with the achievement index developed by the state board of education under RCW 28A.657.110.
(e) A draft of the district's proposed renewal, revocation, and nonrenewal processes, consistent with sections 219 and 220 of the act. The draft provided must, at a minimum, provide for the implementation of transparent and rigorous processes that:
(i) Establish clear standards for renewal, nonrenewal, and revocation of charters it may authorize under section 210 of the act;
(ii) Set reasonable and effective timelines for actions that may be taken under sections 219 and 220 of the act;
(iii) Describe how performance data will be used in making decisions under sections 219 and 220 of the act;
(iv) Outline a plan to take appropriate actions, or exercise sanctions short of revocation, in response to identified deficiencies in charter school performance or legal compliance, in accordance with the charter contract and the provisions of this act.
(4) A district must sign a statement of assurances submitted with its application, that shall be included as an attachment to the authorizing contract executed between the approved board and the state board of education, stating that it seeks to serve as an authorizer in fulfillment of the expectations, spirit, and intent of the act, and that if approved as an authorizer it will:
(a) Seek opportunities for authorizer professional development, and assure that personnel with significant responsibilities for authorizing and oversight of charter schools will participate in any authorizer training provided or required by the state;
(b) Provide public accountability and transparency in all matters concerning charter authorizing practices, decisions, and expenditures;
(c) Solicit applications for both new charter schools and conversion charter schools, while appropriately distinguishing the two types of charter schools in proposal requirements and evaluation criteria;
(d) Ensure that any charter school it oversees shall have a fully independent governing board and exercise autonomy in all matters, to the extent authorized by this act, in such areas as budget, personnel and educational programs;
(e) Ensure that the schools it authorizes will deliver appropriate services to students with disabilities, and will provide access to, and appropriately serve, other special populations of students as required by state and federal law;
(f) Include in any charter contract it may execute with the governing board of an approved charter school, in accordance with section 216(2) of this act, educational services that at a minimum meet the basic education standards set forth in RCW 28A.150.220.
(2) For an application to be approved, the state board must find it to be satisfactory in providing all of the information required to be set forth in the application. The board will also consider whether the district's proposed polices and practices are consistent with the principles and standards for quality charter school authorizing developed by the National Association of Charter School Authorizers, as required by section 210(3) of the act, in at least the following areas:
(a) Organizational capacity: Commit human and financial resources necessary to conduct authorizing duties effectively and efficiently;
(b) Solicitation and evaluation of charter applications: Implement a comprehensive application process that includes clear application questions and rigorous criteria, and grants charters only to applicants who demonstrate strong capacity to establish and operate a charter school;
(c) Performance contracting: Execute contracts with charter schools that articulate the rights and responsibilities of each party regarding school autonomy, funding, administration and oversight, outcomes, measures for evaluating success or failure, performance consequences, and other material terms;
(d) Ongoing charter school oversight and evaluation: Conduct contract oversight that competently evaluates performance and monitors compliance, ensures schools' legally entitled autonomy, protects student rights, informs intervention, revocation and renewal decisions, and provides annual reports as required by this act; and
(e) Charter renewal and revocation processes: Design and implement a transparent and rigorous process that uses comprehensive academic, financial and operational performance data to make merit-based renewal decisions, and revokes charters when necessary to protect student and public interests.
A determination that an application does not provide the required information, or does not meet standards of quality authorizing in any component, shall constitute grounds for disapproval.
(3) The state board of education shall post on its web site the applications of all school districts approved as authorizers. A school district approved as an authorizer shall post its application on a public web site.
(4) If the state board disapproves an application, it shall state in writing the reasons for the disapproval, with specific reference to the criteria established in the charter rules.
(2) The statement of assurances submitted with an authorizer application shall be incorporated as an attachment to the authorizing contract and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth therein.