*(1) For each WAU for which a watershed analysis is undertaken, the department acting under WAC
222-22-040(2) or forest landowner acting under WAC
222-22-040(3) shall assemble a team of field managers qualified under WAC
222-22-030(1). The team shall include persons qualified in the disciplines indicated as necessary in watershed analysis methods, and shall generally include a person or persons qualified in the following:
(a) Forest resource management;
(b) Forest harvest and road systems engineering;
(c) Forest hydrology;
(d) Fisheries science or management;
(e) Cultural anthropology and/or archaeology, depending on the cultural resources identified in the assessment.
Any owner, and any cooperating group of owners, of ten percent or more of the nonfederal forest land acreage in the WAU and any affected Indian tribe shall be entitled to include one qualified individual to participate on the team at its own expense. The cultural resources module must include the participation of the affected Indian tribe(s). See board manual section 11, J. Cultural Resources Module, Introduction, 1) Using this methodology in formal watershed analysis.
*(2) Each forest landowner in a WAU shall have the right to submit prescriptions to the department or the forest landowner conducting the watershed analysis for areas of resource sensitivity on their land. If these prescriptions are received within the time period described in subsection (4) of this section, they shall be considered for inclusion in the watershed analysis.
*(3) For each identified area of resource sensitivity, the field managers team shall, in consultation with the level 1 and level 2 teams, if any, select and recommend prescriptions to the department. These prescriptions shall be reasonably designed to minimize, or to prevent or avoid, as set forth in table 1 in WAC
222-22-050 (2)(c)(iv), the likelihood of adverse change and deliverability that has the potential to cause a material, adverse effect to resource characteristics in accordance with the following:
(a) The prescriptions shall be designed to provide forest landowners and operators with as much flexibility as is reasonably possible while addressing the area of resource sensitivity. The prescriptions should, where appropriate, include, but not be limited to, plans for road abandonment, orphaned roads, and road maintenance and plans for applying prescriptions to recognized land features identified in the WAU as areas of resource sensitivity but not fully mapped;
(b) Restoration opportunities may be included as voluntary prescriptions where appropriate;
(c) Each set of prescriptions shall provide for an option for an alternate plan under WAC
222-12-040, which the applicant shows meets or exceeds the protection provided by the other prescriptions approved for a given area of resource sensitivity;
(d) The rules of forest practices and cumulative effects under this chapter shall not require mitigation for activities or events not regulated under chapter
76.09 RCW. Any hazardous condition subject to forest practices identified in a watershed analysis requiring corrective action shall be referred to the department for consideration under RCW
76.09.300 et seq.; and
(e) Effective July 1, 2001, the forests and fish riparian rules supersede all existing watershed analysis riparian prescriptions with the exception of riparian management zones for exempt 20-acre parcels, when watershed analysis prescriptions were in effect before January 1, 1999. (See WAC
222-30-021,
222-30-022, and
222-30-023.) No new riparian prescriptions will be written after completion of the riparian function assessment report during a watershed analysis.
*(4) For each identified cultural resource area of resource sensitivity, the field managers team shall develop cultural resources management strategies in consultation with the assessment team and affected tribe(s).
(a) If a management strategy involves a site registered on the department of archaeology and historic preservation's archaeological and historic sites database, data recovery at an archaeological site, or any resource that requires mandatory protection under chapters
27.44 and
27.53 RCW, the field managers team shall submit the management strategy to the department of archaeology and historic preservation for agreement.
(b) The management strategies should be reasonably designed to protect or allow the recovery of resources by measures that minimize or prevent or avoid risks identified in the assessment.
(c) Management strategies resulting from conducting a cultural resources module are voluntary, not mandatory prescriptions, whether the module is conducted as part of a watershed analysis or as a stand-alone method separate from watershed analysis. However, the mandatory protections of resources under chapters
27.44 and
27.53 RCW still apply.
(5) The field managers team shall submit the recommended prescriptions, monitoring recommendations and cultural resources management strategies to the department within thirty days of the submission to the department of the level 2 assessment under WAC
222-22-060 or within twenty-one days of the submission to the department of the level 1 assessment under WAC
222-22-050.
[Statutory Authority: RCW
76.09.040. WSR 11-12-009, § 222-22-070, filed 5/20/11, effective 6/20/11; WSR 05-12-119, § 222-22-070, filed 5/31/05, effective 7/1/05. Statutory Authority: Chapter
34.05 RCW, RCW
76.09.040, [76.09.]050, [76.09.]370,
76.13.120(9). WSR 01-12-042, § 222-22-070, filed 5/30/01, effective 7/1/01. Statutory Authority: RCW
76.09.040,
76.09.170 and chapter
34.05 RCW. WSR 94-01-134, § 222-22-070, filed 12/20/93, effective 1/1/94. Statutory Authority: RCW
76.09.040,
76.09.050 and chapter
34.05 RCW. WSR 92-15-011, § 222-22-070, filed 7/2/92, effective 8/2/92.]
